0
ManagementGenius

Blog

Time Management for Leaders: Stop Managing Time and Start Leading People

Related Reading: Why companies ought to invest in professional development courses for employees | The role of professional development courses in a changing job market | Why professional development courses are essential for career growth

The bloke next to me at the coffee queue this morning was frantically checking his phone, muttering about back-to-back meetings until 7pm. Classic middle management burnout in action. I wanted to grab his shoulders and say, "Mate, you're not managing time—time's managing you."

After 18 years running teams across three states, I've watched countless leaders fall into the same trap. They think leadership is about cramming more into their calendar. Wrong. Dead wrong.

Real leadership is about creating space for your people to shine.

The Myth That's Killing Australian Leaders

Here's what they don't teach you in those fancy MBA programmes: the best leaders I know are terrible at traditional time management. They show up late to their own meetings. They forget to update their calendars. But their teams consistently outperform everyone else.

Why? Because they've figured out something most leaders miss entirely.

Time management for leaders isn't about managing your time—it's about multiplying everyone else's.

Take Sarah, who runs operations for a logistics company in Brisbane. When I first met her, she was drowning. Working 65-hour weeks, micromanaging every delivery route, checking every invoice personally. Her team was frustrated, mistakes were climbing, and she looked like she hadn't slept in months.

Six months later, her division was the most profitable in the company. What changed? She stopped trying to control every minute and started investing her time in developing her people.

The Four-Hour Rule That Changed Everything

The best piece of advice I ever received came from a gruff warehouse supervisor in Wollongong. "Spend four hours teaching someone to do something properly, and you'll save yourself 400 hours of fixing their mistakes."

Sounds obvious, right? Yet 73% of leaders I work with still believe delegation means dumping tasks on people without proper instruction.

Real delegation requires upfront investment. You need to train your people properly, show them your thinking process, and create systems they can follow when you're not there.

This is where most leaders fail spectacularly.

They're so focused on crossing items off their own to-do list that they never build the capability in their teams. Result? They become the bottleneck for everything.

Why Your Open Door Policy Is Probably Ruining Your Team

Unpopular opinion: constant availability isn't leadership—it's enabling dependence.

I see this everywhere. Leaders who pride themselves on being "always accessible" while their teams can't make a simple decision without running it past the boss first.

One of my clients, a manufacturing supervisor in Adelaide, used to get interrupted every twelve minutes. Every. Twelve. Minutes. His team had learned to rely on him for everything from supplier queries to lunch orders. He thought this made him indispensable.

Actually, it made him ineffective.

We implemented what I call "decision boundaries." Certain categories of decisions could only be discussed during scheduled check-ins. Everything else, his team had to handle independently.

The first week was chaos. People complained. Some decisions were suboptimal. But by month three, his team was making better decisions than he would have made himself. And he'd reclaimed 4.5 hours per day for strategic work.

Here's the thing about developing people: you have to let them stumble a bit. Otherwise, they never learn to walk.

The Calendar Audit That Reveals Everything

Want to know if you're actually leading or just glorified firefighting? Audit your calendar for the past month.

How much time did you spend in reactive mode versus proactive development?

Real leaders spend at least 30% of their time on activities that won't pay off for three to six months. Training sessions, strategic planning, team development, process improvement.

If your calendar is packed with urgent meetings and crisis management, you're not leading—you're just putting out fires with expensive fuel.

I learned this the hard way during my early days managing a retail team in Perth. Every day felt like an emergency. Staff calling in sick, customer complaints, supplier issues. I was working harder than ever but felt like I was running backwards.

The breakthrough came when I started blocking two hours every Tuesday morning for what I called "future work." No meetings, no phone calls, just strategic thinking and team development planning.

Those two hours probably doubled our efficiency within six months.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Meetings

Most meetings are productivity theatre.

There, I said it.

You know those weekly team meetings where everyone shares updates that could've been sent in a Slack message? The strategy sessions that go for three hours and produce a list of "action items" nobody remembers by Friday?

Complete waste of everyone's time.

Good leaders are ruthless about meetings. They ask: "What decision are we making here, and who actually needs to be involved?"

If you can't answer both questions clearly, cancel the meeting.

I once worked with a tech startup where the CEO spent 34 hours per week in meetings. Thirty-four hours. His solution? More meetings to discuss why projects were falling behind.

We cut his meeting load by 60% and instituted a simple rule: every meeting had to have a clear decision point and a maximum of five participants.

Revenue jumped 40% in the next quarter. Not because people worked harder—because they finally had time to work on things that mattered.

Building Systems That Work When You Don't

The mark of great leadership isn't how indispensable you are—it's how well things run when you're not there.

Smart leaders build systems, not dependencies.

This means documenting processes, creating decision trees, and—this is crucial—actually testing them when you're away.

Take a week off and see what breaks. Those breakage points show you exactly where you need to invest more development time.

One of my favourite examples is a café owner in Melbourne who used to open every morning at 5am personally. Couldn't trust anyone else with the till, the stock ordering, the daily specials.

We spent three months systematising everything. Created checklists, trained backup managers, implemented simple reporting systems.

Now he works three days a week and his profits are higher than when he was there seven days.

The secret? He stopped being the solution to every problem and started being the person who created problem-solving capability in others.

The Energy Management Revolution

Time management is yesterday's thinking. Energy management is where the smart money is.

Different people have different peak performance windows. Some are sharp first thing in the morning, others hit their stride after lunch.

Great leaders map their team's energy patterns and assign work accordingly.

Your detail-oriented accountant might be perfect for complex analysis at 9am but hopeless at client presentations after 3pm. Your creative marketing person might produce garbage in morning meetings but brilliant campaign ideas during afternoon brainstorms.

Work with people's natural rhythms instead of against them.

This requires actually paying attention to your team as humans, not just production units.

Why Most Leadership Training Gets It Wrong

Here's something that'll ruffle some feathers: most leadership development focuses on the wrong things.

They teach you about communication styles and conflict resolution and strategic thinking. All useful stuff. But they miss the fundamental truth about modern leadership.

Your job isn't to have all the answers—it's to develop people who can find the answers.

This means spending less time being the expert and more time being the coach.

Instead of solving problems for your team, ask them: "What do you think we should do?" Then listen. Really listen. Even when their first suggestions aren't quite right.

Especially then.

The Compound Effect of Leader Development

When you invest time in developing your people, the returns compound exponentially.

A team member who learns to handle customer complaints independently doesn't just save you time this week—they save you time every week for as long as they're with you.

Someone who develops project management skills can eventually run entire initiatives without your oversight.

This is how you scale leadership. Not by working longer hours, but by multiplying your capability through others.

Making the Shift

If you're reading this thinking, "This all sounds great, but I don't have time to develop people," you've missed the point entirely.

You don't have time NOT to develop people.

Every hour you spend developing capability in your team saves you multiple hours down the track. Every process you systematise is time you'll never have to spend on that problem again.

Start small. Pick one recurring problem that ends up on your desk every week. Instead of solving it yourself, involve the person who brings it to you in finding the solution.

Make them think it through. Ask questions. Guide them to the answer rather than giving it to them.

Yes, it takes longer initially. But it's an investment, not an expense.

The best leaders I know understand this instinctively. They're not trying to be heroes—they're trying to build other heroes.

Because at the end of the day, that's what real leadership looks like. Not someone who can handle everything personally, but someone who's built a team that can handle everything collectively.

And that's when you finally stop managing time and start leading people.